EXPLORING EFL LEARNERS’ PREFERENCES FOR PRAGMATIC MARKERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47255/vcx73285Keywords:
Pragmatic Markers, Matched-guise Methodology, EFL learnersAbstract
This preliminary study is motivated by the role of pragmatic markers in both spoken and written communication, which reflects speaking fluency. It employs Beeching’s (2016) matched-guise methodology, utilizing online forms to engage participants from two different locations. The primary aim of this study is to investigate EFL learners’ preferences for using pragmatic markers in their utterances. To gather data, Google Forms were distributed to universities students in two different locations. A total of 39 participants completed the questionnaire, among them were 17 respondents from Central Java, 1 from Bali, 1 from West Java, and 20 from West Kalimantan. Notably, 21 participants identified English as their second language, while 18 reported it as their third language. Upon analysis, the data indicated that participants perceived utterances containing the pragmatic markers "well," "I mean," and "sort of" as embodying polite, direct, and friendly attitudes. While “like” tends to contribute to a sense of indirectness in communication, the utterances featuring "you know" and "just" had no significant impact on the directness of the statements. Future researchers should investigate the broader categories and contextual variations of these markers that were potentially overlooked in the current study.
References
Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh University Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635511
Aijmer, K. (2015). Pragmatic markers. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge University Press.
Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. In Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, L. J. (2017). The evolution of pragmatic markers in English: Pathways of change. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, D., Fernández, J., & Huensch, A. (2023). The role of pragmatic markers in perceptions of L2 fluency in dialogue. System, 19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103157
Buysse, L. (2017). The pragmatic marker you know in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.010
Degand, L., Cornilie, B., & Pietrandrea, P. (2013). Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description. In L. Degand, B. Cornilie, & P. Pietrandrea (Eds.), Modal particles and discourse markers: Two sides of the same coin? Introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fuller, J. M. (2003). Discourse marker use across speech contexts: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Multilingua, 22(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2003.010
Hansen, M.-B. M. (1998). The function of discourse particles. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Hardianti, Y., & Sudarsono, S. (2021). English varieties in the Year-7 coursebook taught in Indonesia. JELTIM (Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials), 3(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v3i1.39096
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.008
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
Pichler, H. (2016). Introduction: discourse-pragmatic variation and change. In H. Pichler (Ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in english: New methods and insights (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295476
Putri, F. F., Utomo, D. W., & Fargianti, Y. (2021). An Investigation of macrolinguistic errors in Indonesian EFL learners’ essays. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching), 5(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v5i2.11423
Salgado, E. F. (2011). The pragmatics of requests and apologies. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schneider, K. P. (2018). Methods and ethics of data collection. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 37–96). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-201
Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107, 227–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/414540
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Citra Suryanovika (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
